Comparative Shots
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H2 and Nikon D2x
|
This gallery compares the type of photos you can get from two dramatically different cameras, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H2 and Nikon D2x. I use a 12 mega pixel Nikon D2X DSLR camera. My favorite lenses are my Nikon 70-200 mm F 2.8 VR zoom lens and my Nikon 300 mm F 2.8 VR lens. And for extra reach I use these lenses with either a Nikon 1.4x or a 1.7x teleconverter. Approximate cost $12,500. My wife, Maggie, uses a Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H2, which has built in optical vibration reduction, with a Sony 1.7 x teleconverter which gives her the same reach as my longest lens combination (about 750 mm in 35 mm equivalent terms). Approximate cost $450. In reviewing these pictures I think the picture quality is close match to that of my more (much more) expensive DSLR setup. And I have been shooting for a few years now compared to Maggie's few months with her Sony. |
Click on image for larger size picture and slideshow.
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 1: There are numerous alternative cameras to Maggie's on the market. And many of them are good choices. Just make sure that the camera has at least 6 mega pixels (more is not necessarily better), at least 10x optical (not digital) zoom, built in optical (not digital or software) image stabilization, an optical viewfinder, and the availability of a 1.5x - 2.0x teleconverter offered by the manufacturer of the camera. Note 2: If you decide to go the DSLR route, go with either Nikon or Canon as both have a wide variety of lenses available and both are in business for the long haul. That said, while I went with Nikon and am happy with my decision, I think Canon is probably a better choice today for wildlife photographers as their high end telephoto lenses in the $5000 price range are less expensive than their Nikon equivalents by about $1000. Note 3: dpreview.com is the best place for unbiased, in-depth reviews of cameras. And if you get overwhelmed by the amount of detail, just read the conclusions. |
© 2007 by Peter Schulz